A look at the Plymouth School District budget


2013-15 budget

The Plymouth School District is concerned about a freeze in school spending proposed by Gov. Scott Walker, as well as a plan to expand the school voucher program.

A freeze particularly hurts districts such as Plymouth that historically have been frugal. Plymouth ranks 397th in the state in per-pupil spending, though its students perform in the top 10 percent on the state’s standardized tests.

Plymouth fully implemented the “tools” provided by Act 10, but savings were limited because the district already had made many of the required changes.

Lawmakers are currently debating the governor’s proposed two-year budget, which would take effect July 1. It also includes an expansion of school vouchers, which transfer state aid to private schools, to nine additional districts, including Sheboygan.

Superintendent Clark Reinke encouraged concerned citizens to contact their legislators. “They hear from me all the time,” he said. “If they hear from parents and from grandparents and from the business community, I think that has a greater impact.”

Learn more:
Click here for legislator contact information.
Click here for a list of background talking points regarding Gov. Walker’s budget proposal.

 

The Budget Process

Faculty and staff submit budget requests Proposed budget is drafted District Leadership Team reviews proposed budget School Board discusses proposal School Board finalizes budget Electors approve levy Board certifies levy
Jan.-March March-April April-May June-July August September October


Where does the money come from?

Revenues: 2011-2012 General Fund Budget
State aid $11,433,250 50%
Local taxes $10,074,190 44%
Federal aid $730,832 3%
Open enrollment $687,828 3%
Other $49,700 <1%
Total $22,975,800 100%

Where does the money go
Expenses: 2011-2012 General Fund Budget
Instruction $10,837,866 47%
Support services $8,286,776 36%
Other $3,962,829 17%
Total $23,087,471 100%



2011-12 Property Tax Levy
General Fund $9,778,625 85%
Fund 30: Debt $1,377,987 12%
Fund 80: Comm Ed. $200,000 2%
Fund 38: WRS loan $160,591 1%
Total $11,565,799 100%


What is the impact of declining state aid?
Changes to balance 2009-10 budget
Secured federal stimulus money $347,000
Closed Cascade school $240,000
Cut salaries and benefits $190,000
Cut staffing and services $179,000
Changed transportation plan $150,000
Moved fifth-graders to Riverview $124,000
Riverview extracurriculars to Comm. Ed. $60,000
Cut salaries and benefits $190,000
Raised activity fees $50,000
Total $1,340,000


What is the district doing about the situation?
The district has taken the lead in developing the Sheboygan County Regional Planning Initiative, a set of recommendations to improve education in our region and hopefully the state. The recommendations were crafted over created over nine months by board members, school administrators, union representatives and legislators.

In addition, the district has taken a proactive approach to planning for its financial future. A subcommittee of the Board of Education has analyzed:
The most promising ideas for increasing enrollment include:
  • Engaging parents more in the schools, raising expectations for all participants
  • Using computers or other technology for high school students to replace textbooks
  • Expanding science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) classes at all levels, including an alternative energy curriculum
  • Offering more AP courses
  • Expanding the Pegasus after-school program
  • Bolstering already solid fine-arts programs
  • Expanding the online school
Adminstrators have developed implementation plans for each of these, and the district already is moving foward with the first three.


Cost-cutting measures evaluated include:
  • Spending down the fund balance
  • Eliminating all busing
  • Selling unneeded district property
  • Consolidating elementary schools
  • Reducing program offerings
  • Establishing a health center to help employees manage health-care costs
  • Reducing support staff
  • Consolidating bus stops
  • Seeking a referendum to exceed revenue limits
  • Consolidating with neighboring school districts
  • Limiting increases in staff costs
  • Pursuing grants
  • Joining a consortium on funding alternatives